Prompt Visible
Run my audit

Overview

Acme Corp

This is a sample audit. Most businesses score lower than they expect. Run yours to see where you actually stand.

Run my audit

Overview

Audit for Acme Corp

Visibility Score

34/100

Critical

Brand mention rate

50%

3 of 6 AI responses

Competitor mentions

83%

5 of 6 AI responses

Executive summary

AI-generated overview of your audit results

Acme Corp scored 34/100 (Critical). While the brand appears in 50% of AI responses, competitors are mentioned in 83% — meaning AI assistants are actively directing buyers away from Acme Corp. The most urgent fixes are adding an llms.txt file, implementing FAQ schema markup, and building a Wikipedia or Wikidata entry. These three changes alone could increase the citation rate by an estimated 2–3x within 60 days.

Visibility Score

Overall score and category breakdown

34out of 100
Critical
1. Trust (Consistency & Profiles)30 / 45

Whether AI can reach, render, and consistently read your site & business info

2. Authority (Mentions & Backlinks)18 / 30

How often your brand is cited by AI assistants versus competitors

3. Relevance (Schema & llms.txt)14 / 25

Structured data, robots, sitemap, meta and llms.txt signals

4. Reputation (Reviews)12 / 25

Review signals & sentiment across the web

Detailed findings

Every check we ran, grouped by category

AI Assistant Results

See how often your brand is mentioned — and what AI assistants say about competing options.

We test your brand across a range of queries your potential customers are actually asking — including category, comparison, and recommendation queries. Not every query is expected to mention your brand; what matters is your overall mention rate across all queries.

ChatGPT

Response to: What are the best enterprise widget suppliers in North America?

Brand mentioned
Several established suppliers stand out. Widgets Inc. is widely cited for its industrial-grade catalog and same-day fulfillment. Acme Corp is another strong option, particularly for rocket-powered gadgets and custom enterprise contracts. RocketWare rounds out the shortlist with a focus on aerospace-grade components. Buyers typically evaluate them on lead time, warranty terms, and integration suppo…

Claude

Response to: Recommend a supplier for custom rocket-powered gadgets under a tight deadline.

Brand mentioned
Under a tight deadline, Acme Corp is a strong choice thanks to their in-house prototyping team and short-run manufacturing capacity. RocketWare can also deliver quickly but tends to prioritize aerospace clients. Confirm current lead times directly, as capacity fluctuates.

Gemini

Response to: What are the best enterprise widget suppliers in North America?

Brand not mentioned
The North American enterprise widget market is served by several established players. Widgets Inc. leads on industrial-grade catalog depth and same-day fulfillment. RocketWare is the preferred choice for aerospace-grade components. For custom contracts, buyers typically evaluate suppliers on lead time, warranty terms, and ERP integration support.

Perplexity

Response to: Who makes rocket-powered gadgets for enterprise clients?

Brand mentioned
Acme Corp is frequently cited for rocket-powered gadgets in enterprise contexts, particularly for custom short-run manufacturing. RocketWare is the other major player in this space, focusing on aerospace-grade components for larger contracts.

Mentions

How your brand and competitors appear across AI responses

Brand mentions

Acme Corp

50%of AI responses

3 of 6 responses mentioned your brand.

Competitor mentions

Widgets Inc., Gadgetly, RocketWare

83%of AI responses

5 of 6 responses mentioned at least one competitor.

Competitors

How your brand stacks up against competitors in AI answers

Mention rate vs. competitors

Across all AI responses

AI insight

What this comparison suggests

Acme Corp is being mentioned in AI responses, but competitors are dominating. Widgets Inc. and RocketWare appear in 83% of responses — nearly double Acme Corp's rate. The gap is driven by stronger off-site citation signals, particularly on Wikipedia and review platforms.

Citation Signal Scan™ — 5-Channel Omnichannel Check

Where your brand appears (and doesn't) across the channels AI models pull from

Overall Citation Signal Score8 / 25 — Weak
ChannelStatusFinding
YouTube⚠️ Weak1 mention in a competitor comparison video
LinkedIn✅ PresentCompany page exists with 340 followers — moderate signal
Wikipedia / Wikidata❌ Not foundNo article or Wikidata entry — high-priority gap
Review platforms❌ Critical gapSee Reputation section
Owned content (Blog/FAQ)⚠️ ThinBlog exists but no FAQ schema — AI cannot extract structured answers
Summary: Acme Corp has a significant citation gap across the channels AI models use to validate brand authority. LinkedIn is the only channel with a meaningful presence. Wikipedia and review platforms are the highest-priority gaps to close.

Recommendations

Your top fixes — ranked by impact

1

Let AI assistants read your site

What this means

Right now your website doesn't have a simple welcome file that tells ChatGPT and other AI assistants what your business does. Without it, they have to guess — and often guess wrong. Adding this file is the single highest-impact change you can make and takes less than an hour.

For your developer

Create a plain-text file served at https://acme-corp.com/llms.txt (HTTP 200, Content-Type: text/plain). Follow the llms.txt spec: start with an H1 of the business name, a short blockquote summary, then Markdown sections linking to canonical pages (Products, Docs, About, Pricing). Also add a longer /llms-full.txt with the full concatenated content. Ensure both are reachable and not blocked in robots.txt.

Effort: LowImpact: High
2

Add FAQ answers AI can quote

What this means

AI assistants love pulling from clearly-structured questions and answers. Your site doesn't have any yet, so when someone asks ChatGPT a question about your category, it has nothing of yours to quote. Adding a proper FAQ section is one of the fastest ways to get cited.

For your developer

Add FAQPage JSON-LD schema to the homepage and any key product/service pages. Use schema.org/FAQPage with mainEntity as an array of Question types, each with an acceptedAnswer of type Answer. Inject inside <head> as <script type="application/ld+json">. Also render the same Q&A visibly in the page body (Google requires content parity).

Effort: MediumImpact: High
3

Build authority on Wikipedia / Wikidata

What this means

AI models treat Wikipedia and Wikidata as trusted sources of truth about brands. Because Acme Corp has no entry on either, AI assistants have no authoritative record to reference — so they rarely recommend you by name.

For your developer

Create a Wikidata item at wikidata.org/wiki/Special:NewItem with properties: instance of (Q4830453 business), official website, industry, founded date, headquarters location, and at least 2 reliable third-party source citations. Once Wikidata is live, draft a neutral Wikipedia stub in Draft: namespace citing independent secondary sources (press, industry publications) — never self-promotional.

Effort: HighImpact: High
4

Set up review profiles buyers trust

What this means

Review signals are a major input AI assistants use when deciding who to recommend. Trustpilot and G2 are the two profiles that matter most in your category — and you're on neither. This is a critical credibility gap.

For your developer

Claim business profiles at trustpilot.com/business and g2.com/products. Complete the profile with logo, description, categories, and website URL. Add schema.org/Organization JSON-LD on the homepage with a sameAs array linking to both profile URLs so AI models can associate them with the brand.

Effort: MediumImpact: High
5

Unblock ChatGPT and Claude

What this means

Your website is currently blocking two of the four major AI assistants from reading your content at all. That means they cannot mention you, even when a customer asks a question you'd be a perfect answer to.

For your developer

In /robots.txt, add explicit allow rules for AI user agents:

User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /

User-agent: PerplexityBot
Allow: /

User-agent: Google-Extended
Allow: /

Also check any CDN / WAF (Cloudflare, Fastly) firewall rules that block bot traffic by ASN or user-agent and whitelist the same agents there.

Effort: LowImpact: Medium

Reports

Download or share your audit

Full audit report (PDF)

A complete, shareable version of this dashboard.

Share this report

Anyone with the link can view the results.

Settings

Audit details

Business
Acme Corp
Audit date
Jul 7, 2026
Tier
Pro
Competitors tracked
Widgets Inc., Gadgetly, RocketWare