Sample report
Sample AI Visibility Audit Report
This is a complete Prompt Visible report for Acme Corp, a fictional example used to show exactly what you receive: three transparent scores, the six technical checks, verbatim answers from four AI assistants, and a prioritized fix list written for both you and your developer.
Your three scores
Foundation Score = % of technical checks passed. AI Visibility Score = % of AI answers that mention you. Overall = the average. Every number shows its X-of-Y math.
Overall Score — Barely Visible
the average of your two scores
Invisible and blocked — start with the foundation fixes.
Acme Corp is technically reachable but almost never named when buyers ask AI assistants for a recommendation in its category. Competitors are being surfaced instead. Four of the fixes below are one-week jobs.
Foundation Score
50 /100
3 of 6 checks passed
The percentage of technical checks your site passed. Acme passes crawler access, robots.txt and sitemap.xml, and fails llms.txt, schema markup and server-side rendering.
AI Visibility Score
19 /100
mentioned in 6 of 32 AI answers
The percentage of AI answers that mention you. Acme was named in 6 of the 32 answers we collected across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini.
What the report looks like

Technical foundations
Six live HTTP checks run against your domain, as the AI crawlers themselves see it.
Crawler access (6 AI user agents)
All six fetches returned 200.
robots.txt
Present, no AI crawler blocked.
llms.txt
Missing — assistants have no curated entry point.
sitemap.xml
Found, 34 URLs discovered.
Schema markup
Organization only; no Service or FAQPage.
JS rendering dependency
Key copy only appears after JavaScript runs.
AI citation results
We generate 8 buyer-intent questions for your category and ask all four assistants — 32 real AI answers — then measure how often your brand is named.
2 of 8 answers named Acme Corp
0 of 8 answers named Acme Corp
3 of 8 answers named Acme Corp (one cited a directory, not acme.com)
1 of 8 answers named Acme Corp
“For mid-market treasury automation, the vendors most often shortlisted are Northwind Ledger, Kestrel Finance Cloud and Orbit Treasury. Northwind is usually favoured for multi-entity consolidation…”

Prioritized fixes
Every recommendation is written twice: once in plain English for you, once as an implementation note for whoever owns the site.
Priority 1
Publish an llms.txt file
What this means
Give AI assistants a short, plain-text map of what you do and which pages matter. It is a small, self-contained change to your site.
For your developer
Serve /llms.txt as text/plain with a company summary and a linked index of canonical pages. Mirror the long form at /llms-full.txt.
Priority 2
Server-render the pages you want cited
What this means
Right now some of your best copy only appears after the page loads scripts. Several AI crawlers never see it.
For your developer
Move category and service copy into the SSR payload. Verify with curl -A 'GPTBot' and confirm the text is present in the raw HTML.
Priority 3
Add Service and FAQPage schema
What this means
Structured data tells assistants exactly what you sell and answers the questions buyers ask, in a format they can quote.
For your developer
Add JSON-LD Service on each offering page and FAQPage on the pricing and support pages. Validate against schema.org.
Priority 4
Build third-party mention volume
What this means
Assistants repeat what the wider web says about you. Four review profiles and two industry mentions moves this category more than any on-site change.
For your developer
Claim and complete review profiles, publish comparison pages, and pursue two category round-up placements per quarter.
How we test
- Six live technical checks
- We fetch your site as six AI user agents (GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended and a control browser), then parse robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap.xml, schema markup, semantic HTML and JavaScript dependency.
- 8 questions across 4 engines = 32 AI answers
- We generate buyer-intent questions for your specific category, then ask ChatGPT (GPT-4o), Claude, Gemini and Perplexity. Every answer is stored verbatim in your report so you can read exactly what a buyer would see.
- Citation Signal Scan™ (Visibility Proof Package)
- Five off-site channels — YouTube, LinkedIn, Wikipedia, review platforms and owned content — reported as diagnostic findings that explain why your mention rate is what it is. They are not score inputs.
- Transparent scoring
- Foundation Score = % of technical checks passed. AI Visibility Score = % of AI answers that mention you. Overall = the average. Every number shows its X-of-Y math, so you can re-test and see movement.
Get this for your domain
The Full Visibility Audit is $149. The Visibility Proof Package is $249 and adds category-correct competitor evidence, the Citation Signal Scan™ and one comparable 30-day re-test. We email your report as soon as the audit is complete.
100% Money-Back Guarantee if we cannot generate a complete report for your domain. Learn more.
Prefer to poke at the live version? Open the interactive sample dashboard.
Now see the answer for your own business.
The free snapshot shows a preliminary score and one real AI answer about your category. The full audit unlocks the complete evidence.
See what AI says about my business